Old Testament:
Scholars differ about the formation of the canon of the Old Testament.
It seems, however, clear that Jewish
communities had authoritative collections of the Law, the Prophets,
and the other Writings by the end of the first century.
Apocrypha:
Early Christian communities were nearly uniform in their acceptance
of the same canon of the Old Testament used in the synagogues. Some
Christian communities, however, admitted a larger list of the Writings
than other communities. This larger list included the books now known
as the apocryphal or deuterocanonical books in, for example, the Revised
Standard Version of the Bible. 1 and 2 Maccabees are among the most
significant of these writings.
New Testament:
By the middle of the second century the central writings of the New
Testament (Gospels, Letters of Paul, Hebrews, and Acts) were widely
accepted, with other writings being excluded or included somewhat later.
Hebrews, Jude, 2 Peter, 3 John, and Revelation were often disputed.
Revelation remained in question longer than any other canonical book.
Other writings, including the Shepherd of Hermas, were by some churches
considered a part of the canon for a time. The Marcionite
church acknowledged a very small canon. East and West did not come to
full agreement about the canon until early in the fourth century. In
367 Athanasius presents the canon
of the New Testament as finally fixed by the churches of both East and
West.